Aci lap splice table9/28/2023 ACI 318-14, Section 22.9 (shear friction)īefore we get started, we need to define what it means to develop a reinforcing bar.ACI 318-14, Section 18.10 (special structural walls).ACI 318-14, Section 18.8 (joints of special moment frames).ACI 318-14, Section 25.4 (development of reinforcement) and Section 25.5 (splices).Qualification of Post-Installed Reinforcing Bars (PIRBs).The last part of the blog covers some important considerations for using the RDLP. We will look at four design examples using Simpson Strong-Tie® SET-3G® adhesive evaluated in accordance with the RDLP of ACI 318-14, Chapters 25 and 18. Today, the RDLP can be applied to qualified adhesives as an alternative solution to the anchoring provision of ACI 318. Their contribution, and others, supported the idea that post-installed reinforcing bars could be evaluated using the rebar development length provision (RDLP) of ACI 318 that has been widely used in its current form for many decades. Their research showed that post-installed reinforcing bars (PIRBs) behave in structurally similar ways to cast-in-place reinforcing bars. This very informative report is free and available online through the Florida Department of Transportation. In their series of experiments, holes were drilled adjacent to cast-in-place bars using a carbide-tipped drill bit, and new bars were secured in these holes using an anchoring adhesive presumed to be of a type commonly used in concrete construction. I first learned about the application of the ACI 318 development length provision to post-installed reinforcing bars back in 2003 when I read Post-Installed Adhesive-Bonded Splices in Bridge Decks, authored by Ronald A. Engineers can access a free online calculation tool to easily determine the rebar development or lap splice length for either adhesive product. Additionally, SET-3G has slightly reduced edge and spacing requirements. In general, a substantially lower installation cost can be expected using SET-3G for seismic applications. SET-3G does not carry the same limitation allowing for a considerable reduction in development length at higher values of f’c. The SET-XP evaluation report, ESR-2508, currently limits f’c to 2,500 psi for seismic applications located in seismic design category C–F. This blog has been reposted replacing SET-XP with SET-3G using the original design examples. It is also observed that lap splice length (ls) decreases when the concrete strength (f’c) increases.The evaluation report, ESR-4057, was recently updated to allow the design of SET-3G adhesive for post-installed reinforcing bars using the ACI 318 development length provision. It is also found from that bars of higher yield strength (f¬y) requires larger lap splice length (ls). AASTHO and BNBC design codes also exhibit same splice length for 36 mm Φ bar or smaller. Lap splice length (ls) increases when the bar diameter (d¬b) increases. AASTHO and BNBC design codes recommend smaller lap splice lengths (ls). CEB - FIP MODEL recommends larger splice length for larger bars than 12mm Φ bar. After analyzing the sample calculations and graphs it is concluded that among all codes, ACI code recommends the larger splice length for12mm Φ bar. In this thesis parametric study was performed where compressive strength of concrete (f’c), yield strength of the reinforcing bars (fy) and bar diameters were the parameter. In this study we reviewed ACI (2002), BNBC (1993), AASHTO (2007), CEBFIP Model (1990) and EURO Code 2(2003) design codes and compared the variation of lap splice length. Various design codes have provided many laws to calculate lap splice length. In this study tension and contact lap splices are considered. Non-contact lap-spliced bars should not be spaced too far apart. Contact splices in which the bars touch and are wired together are preferred because they are more secure against displacement during construction. One is contact and the other one is non contact. The length of the lap varies depend on concrete strength, the rebar grade, size, and spacing. A lap is when two pieces of rebar are overlapped to create a continuous line of rebar. Properly designed splices are a key component in a well-executed design. Splices of reinforcing bars are unavoidable. Just as it is physically impossible to place all concrete in one continuous operation, it is impossible to provide full-length, continuous reinforcing bars throughout any sizeable structure. Due to practical limitations, the actual structure must be built piece-by-piece, story-by-story, and connected together.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |